MoPrint Grows a Medium
MoPrint 2024 is finally done now, and there’s a sense of relief for me. It’s hard work, and there are a lot of details and dates to keep track of. Sometimes, I get so busy and tired, I don’t get to see everything I’d like to.
This year I did pretty well, on that point. In general, as the weather improves, I see more shows, and that improves my chances as MoPrint moves farther into Spring. I skipped the opening for the 528.0 show, for example, in frigid weather, but then saw it later on on a beautiful day. I didn’t see every show, or even most. That would be hard to do. But the shows I saw confirmed a pet theory: events like MoPrint make the print community stronger in the state.
It’s amazing how much interesting work there is to see, and it seems to get more interesting each event. Printmaking can be somewhat hidebound. It’s not so surprising, considering it was originally popularized in Northern Europe as a way of illustrating books, and eventually in Netherlands to bring fine art to the growing middle class ( It was also popular in Asia, at an even earlier period, but I’m not as familiar with the history, which I assume includes some of the same motivations. I certainly don’t dispute or minimize this influential history, just can’t speak to it). Advertising and political thought followed, and eventually with commercial processes, graphic entertainments such as comics. I enjoy all of these facets of print, but as fine art, prints have tended to play a subsidiary role to sculpture and painting. And they have tended to stick close to their commercial, didactic roots.
Two reasons come to mind: The first is the aspect of illustration I’ve already alluded to, in which printed images are often utilized in conjunction with words, in very didactic ways. Second is the primacy of process in the medium, in which complex, ever evolving technologies must be mastered in order to get consistent results. And consistency is gospel in fine art printmaking, never far from the commercial imperative of publishing and selling editions of identical images at relatively low margins.
The idea of making monotypes beguiled me ( a former painter and draughtsman ) with their spontaneity and unpredictability, and their unique properties as one-of-a-kind prints. Monotypes have been around since the 1600s, but have always been a bit of a backwater in the medium, itself a backwater in high art. Process adds another layer of didacticism to printmaking, already shuttled into the ghetto of illustrative art. Monotypes are a very simple process, and give themselves to spontaneity and experimentation. They seem to have experienced a resurgence beginning with Abstract Expressionism. With this, I think I’ve made my perspective (bias?) on printmaking clear.
These more traditional, process things seem to me to be baked into printmaking, which is why I am pleased to report that MoPrint 20024 seems to have continued the trend of encouraging experimentation in the medium, and what’s more, is starting to reward it. A strength of printmaking is social exchange, not just in the democratic accessibility of image and word, but at process level as artists gather around not very portable equipment in groups working together.
It’s not a surprising development. MoPrint, by inspiring a plethora of shows, classes and demonstrations, talks and parties, fosters exchange. I mentioned in my last post how those of us on the first organizing committee were surprised by how many printmakers there were in the region. Even at my own school, there are now more than 10 instructors offering classes. That’s a lot of different processes, techniques and approaches.
At one of my shows, the Colorado Print Educators show at Red Rocks CC, the opening was lightly attended. Late on, it devolved into a group of us teachers walking around to hear about each person’s work. One artist, who also teaches ceramics at, I believe, Arapahoe CC ( I apologize for going on my poor memory here, I regret not taking notes but did not intend to write a review ) had figured out how to print ceramic etchings onto vellum or something, and had made light boxes from that. While I can’t accurately describe her process ( I’d had no wine, I swear ), it was only one of many incredible conversations I’d had about techniques I’d never heard of. And each new technique seems to bring its own array of graphic permutations and challenges. Printmakers were forcing themselves to adapt. It’s the crucible of spontaneity and experiment.
Everywhere I went, people were having similar talks. Not to mention the “civilians”, many of whom were learning, for the first time, the difference between intaglio and relief. Or importantly, real printmaking and “fine art” Giclees and other commercial reproductions.
This brings me back to the Arvada Center, which sort of became the holy center of this year’s MoPrint. They hosted the 528.0 show, a regional exhibition juried by print experts from around the nation (open to artists living within 528 miles of the Mile High City, get it?) This had its share of traditional, process-oriented work, but was certainly not afraid of experimentation. Several print installations were included, for example, including one involving car tires inked up and rolled across long sheets of paper, which strikingly addressed innovation in process, but I’m not sure had much else to say. A large wall hanging by Taiko Chandler, printed on Tyvek construction sheeting, and cut into looping designs, was far more successful. There was a beautiful installation of monotypes of ethereal leaf motifs hanging in the center of one gallery by Alicia McKim. On the walls I was struck by a simple, stenciled cyanotype, exposed, then shifted slightly and exposed again, the characteristic blue hues creating watery passages of light. All in all, a nice show. I went there during Print Jam, where crazy printmakers roll presses into the gallery and demonstrate various techniques, including a gentleman (again, apologies for not taking names ) who participates in the burgeoning discipline of traffic cone printing, where those smushed, muddy derelict orange cones we murder with our cars in construction zones are collected from the ditches and carved (they’re essentially linoleum) then rolled and printed.
If AC was the holy center, Sue Oehme was the high priest. She seemed to be everywhere during MoPrint, but her show in the upstairs gallery in Arvada set the tone. Oehme, a master printer who formerly worked in NYC with name artists such as Frank Stella, and who now runs a studio in Steamboat Springs, showed many of her clients, including a Stella, in rare black and white. Printmaking, with its stripped down aesthetics, often offers revelatory moments. And again, here was Taiko Chandler, combining collograph, monotype and stencil. A product of ASLD classes beginning in 2011, her creative progress has been phenomenal.
But the highlight of these shows was Oehme’s installations of hundreds of shards of paper and acetate, stained by their use in her watercolor monotypes and arranged in rainbow patterns of related hues on the walls, and ultimately in the heavens, hanging in resplendent clouds, floating and glittering in the front lobby, in the low early Spring MoPrint sun as one came down the main stairwell.
Other shows also highlighted adventure and innovation. NKollective, in the Santa Fe Arts District, an encaustic/cold wax gallery, showed artists such as Victoria Eubanks and Michelle Lamb, encaustic instructors who have been leaders in the rather saucy love affair between encaustic and printmaking ( using monotypes or other prints as basis for the translucent beeswax ). But a very interesting artist at NKollective is Carol Till, a graduate of the Botanic Gardens’ botanical illustration academy, the epicenter of traditional process, who turned to the polymer etching process to make multiples of her laboriously limned flowers and grasses and bird’s nests, only to see the repeated images as an opportunity for experiment. Now, combining photograms, polymer etchings, printed chine colle’ on textured papers, along with traditional watercolor, she achieves complex layerings of her images in negative and positive iterations, all still, of course, botanically accurate. She’s a sharp woman, fun to talk with, I know her and her equally interesting hub, Greg, well. It’s quite possible her work would have progressed so quickly into such unique directions without the Art Students League print room ( where she worked for a long time before buying a press), or the biennial madness of MoPrint ( with whom, she’s another longtime volunteer ). But I wonder.
Small moments of innovation pop up everywhere-Kathie Lucas smoothly blended up-cycled materials into some otherwise traditional monotype landscapes at Tenn Street Coffee.
Early during this MoPrint, I went to the Black Ink show at Trve Brewing. This show exemplifies the democratic spirit of MoPrint, and also the madness. It’s a benefit for the MoPrint org, where artists start in fall, carving donated Lino blocks, which are then printed in editions of 25 at Ghenghis Kern letterpress ( speaking of experiment- in a letterpress shop! Check out their printer’s dingbat assemblage prints next MoPrint Studio Tour ), then sold for $10 apiece. It’s a tiny Broadway South/Baker thrash metal bar with good micro beers. People line up down the block to stream in and look at all the numbered prints on the wall then get in the other line to buy 5 or 6. I was sitting in the back, by the Nashville hot chicken counter, sipping an IPA and trying to keep the prints I’d bought dry. One was actually two prints, by Collin Parson, the head curator at the Arvada Center: first, a set of wavy lines on Bristol, and another print of them on acetate, so that you can create your own adjustable moire’ image. Parson is an accomplished sculptor who saw the print medium as a chance to play with perception and optical effects- all for less than the cost of my meal that night.
The thrash band on the stereo was punishing their vocal cords, while the tattooed kids in all black, jeans, Airwalks, the whole bit, stood next to fashionistas to buy art. It was kind of glorious, a leveling in the art scene. Most of these printmakers could never get into a museum. But, on the other hand, that night, the museum people couldn’t get into the thrash metal bar.
Thus, a very quotidian medium meets its moment with verve, fearlessness, and a democratic spirit ( not to mention, prices ). After 11 years, MoPrint has changed the art scene in Denver.
#MoPrint #Printmaking #Art Shows #ASLDprintmakers
